Common Mistakes to Avoid When Submitting IGNOU Synopsis for Approval

Submitting your IGNOU Project Synopsis Experts (online) synopsis is a critical step in your research process, but many students make errors that lead to rejection. This comprehensive guide highlights the most common mistakes and how to prevent them when submitting your synopsis to your guide.

1. Structural Errors

These presentation mistakes often lead to immediate rejection:

• 
  
• Incorrect Font Usage: Not using Times New Roman in 11pt size
  
• Spacing Issues: Ignoring 1.5 line spacing requirements
  
• Margin Problems: Using margins smaller than 2.5 cm
  
• Page Limit Exceeded: Going beyond 10 pages
  

2. Content-Related Mistakes

Substantive errors in your synopsis content:

1. 
   
2. Vague Research Objectives: Broad study goals that lack focus
   
3. Poor Literature Review: Outdated references and citations
   
4. Methodology Flaws: Unrealistic research methods
   
5. Expected Outcomes: Missing projected results
   

3. Supervisor Communication Errors

Mistakes in consulting your guide:

• 
  
• Late Submission: Sharing draft after deadline
  
• Ignoring Feedback: Not addressing guide's suggestions
  
• Missing Signatures: Submitting without proper approvals
  
• Communication Gaps: Not discussing with your guide
  

4. Technical Submission Mistakes

Errors in the submission process:

For Online Submissions:

• 
  
• Uploading wrong file format
  
• Exceeding file size restrictions
  
• Incorrect document naming
  

For Physical Submissions:

• 
  
• Poorly organized copies
  
• Missing cover page
  
• Submission to incorrect department
  

5. Citation Blunders

Common academic referencing mistakes:

• 
  
• Inconsistent Style: Mixing APA formats randomly
  
• Plagiarism: Copied content without attribution
  
• Incomplete References: Missing publication dates
  
• Over-reliance: Too many internet sources
  

6. Timeline Mistakes

Poor time management errors:

1. 
   
2. Starting synopsis at last moment
   
3. Not accounting for guide's review time
   
4. Missing institutional deadlines
   
5. Underestimating correction period
   

7. Presentation Errors

Mistakes that appear unprofessional:

• 
  
• Grammatical errors throughout text
  
• Inconsistent formatting across sections
  
• Handwritten corrections on final copy
  
• Missing table of contents
  

8. Verification Before Submission

Essential verification steps:

9. What Evaluators Look For

Understanding what evaluators typically reject:

• 
  
• Lack of originality in research idea
  
• Overambitious research scope
  
• Poor connection with program objectives
  
• Inadequate methodological foundation
  

10. Preventive Actions

How to prevent these mistakes:

1. 
   
2. Start early of deadlines
   
3. Create multiple versions for review
   
4. Use IGNOU's sample synopses
   
5. Seek colleague feedback
   
6. Verify all requirements twice
   

11. After Rejection

Steps to take if your synopsis gets returned:

• 
  
• Carefully review feedback
  
• Consult your guide
  
• Make targeted improvements
  
• Resubmit within stipulated time
  

12. Success Tips

Positive actions to impress evaluators:

• 
  
• Demonstrate depth of topic
  
• Show practical research methodology
  
• Highlight academic significance
  
• Present neat documentation
  

Conclusion

Avoiding these frequent mistakes will significantly increase your chances of synopsis approval. Remember that your synopsis is the foundation for your entire research project - investing time to get it right initially will save you from complications later. Always consult your guide and follow IGNOU guidelines to the letter for successful approval.

Wishing you success with your synopsis submission!